Narrativa

For a Research Center in Psychoanalysis in a Collective Work. A Construction Together. - eBook

  • 5.00€


  • ISBN: 978-88-5500-125-0
  • Publisher: NeP Edizioni
  • Author: Luciana La Stella
Ships Immediately
In Stock
100 Available pieces
Scarica Anteprima

Acts of the Seminar 2017 This I-AEP Seminar opens a wide debate, initiated b ... Read All


Free Shipping in 24 hours

PAY WITH

cards

Description

Acts of the Seminar 2017

This I-AEP Seminar opens a wide debate, initiated by the desire of some psychoanalysts scattered across Italy, France, and Belgium, to invite European psychoanalysts to engage in discussions on the themes of clinical practice and the theory of their shared profession. What is psychoanalysis? Lacan asked on January 15, 1964, in front of the audience at the École Pratique des Hautes Études, marking a new phase in his teaching and re-elaborating the foundations of psychoanalysis based on four constitutive Freudian concepts: the unconscious, repetition, transference, drive. To provide his own answer to the question he posed, he founded the École, an authoritative space for dialogue, something that, even if opposed by potential detractors, would achieve - precisely through contradiction - the objectivity of its authority. How can we proceed today, when psychoanalysis is challenged with accusations of being unscientific, in a way that supports the autonomy of psychoanalysis? Establishing an institutional space like a shared European Center as a possible place to obtain and update adequate training is a process capable of offering awareness and dignity to speech in an authoritative manner. Providing psychoanalysts who desire it with a workplace used collectively, where reference to their clinical and theoretical inquiries leads to the implicit construction of a place where research is animated by the desire for participation and mutual listening. A place of secular practice, which does not involve the domination of another's experience but embraces the plurality of the method. Only through clinical practice and its theoretical elaboration can psychoanalysis consolidate the analytical encounter.

Talking about training in psychoanalysis today is an act of courage: it involves understanding that psychoanalysis itself has been rejected, defeated, and that through open dialogue it is possible to build a common and recognized foundation for individual and collective training.

We follow the Lacanian binomial of the dimension in psychoanalysis: in extension and in intension; “the root of the experience of the field of psychoanalysis placed in its extension, the only possible basis to motivate a School, is to be found in the psychoanalytic experience itself, () taken in intension.” This is the meaning of the new space and the renewed “act of psychoanalysis.”

Author:

Luciana La Stella Franco Quesito

Format
E-Book

Write a review

Note: HTML is not translated!
    Bad           Good
**Acts du Seminaire 2017** This I-AEP Seminar opens a broad debate, initiated by the desire of some psychoanalysts scattered between Italy, France, and Belgium, to invite European psychoanalysts to engage in discussions on the themes of clinical practice and the theory of their shared profession. *What is psychoanalysis?* Lacan asked on January 15, 1964, in front of the audience at the École Pratique des Hautes Études, initiating a new phase of his teaching and to *re-elaborate* the foundations of psychoanalysis starting from four constitutive Freudian concepts: *the unconscious, repetition, transference, drive*. To provide his own answer to the question he himself posed, he founded the École, an authoritative space of discourse, something that, even if hindered by potential opponents, would achieve - precisely through contradiction - the objectivity of its authority. How can we proceed, now that psychoanalysis is being challenged with accusations of being unscientific, on a path capable of supporting the autonomy of psychoanalysis? Establishing an institutional space like a shared European Center as a possible place to obtain and update adequate training is a process capable of offering awareness and dignity to the word in an authoritative manner. Providing psychoanalysts who desire it with a workplace to be used collectively, where reference to their own clinical and theoretical inquiries leads to the implicit construction of a place where research is animated by the encounter with the desire for participation and mutual listening. A place of secular practice, which does not involve the domination of another's experience but where the plurality of the method is embraced. Only through clinical practice, and its theoretical elaboration, can psychoanalysis consolidate the analytical encounter. Talking about training in psychoanalysis today is an act of courage: it is about understanding that psychoanalysis itself has been rejected, defeated, and that through open dialogue it is possible to build a common and recognized foundation for individual and collective training. We follow the Lacanian binomial of the dimension in psychoanalysis: *in extension* and *in intension*; “the *root* of the experience of the field of psychoanalysis placed in its *extension*, the only possible basis to motivate a School, is to be found in the psychoanalytic experience itself, () taken in *intension*.” This is the meaning of the new space and the renewed “act of psychoanalysis.” Author: [Luciana La Stella](https://www.nepedizioni.com/luciana-la-stella/) [Franco Quesito](https://www.nepedizioni.com/franco-quesito/)

Know the Author

Luciana La Stella

Luciana La Stella è psicoanalista e psicologa. Laureata in Psicologia, Filosofia, Economia e Giurisprudenza, ha conseguito un Master MBA SDA Bocconi. Membro OPL – Ordine Psicologi Lombardia e SLP – Scuola Lacaniana di Psicoanalisi, dal 2015 è il Presidente di OPIFER – Organizzazione Psicoanalisti Italiani Federazione e Registro, membro I-AEP Inter-Associatif de Psychanalyse e FEDEPSY – Fédération Européenne de Psychanalyse. Ha collaborato con lo psichiatra Carlo Viganò in attività di formazione e ricerca. Da sempre è interessata alla multidisciplinarietà e ai diversi saperi, nell’ottica di un’integrazione nell’ambito della conoscenza e della scienza. Collabora con Paolo Ferrari nei Seminari multidisciplinari In-Assenza. Docente MIUR presso SPPG e CPL, collabora con l’Università di Cesena e di Mosca. È autrice e curatrice di molte pubblicazioni scientifiche e dirige per NeP la collana “Nuovi Orizzonti di Inconscio e Società”.

Write a Custom message


For a Research Center in Psychoanalysis in a Collective Work. A Construction Together. - eBook